TMFM vs. GLRY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 3.39%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for GLRY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

TMFM vs. GLRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLRY's 17.07% return.

TMFM

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 6M: -11.03%
• 1Y: -18.27%
• 3Y*: 3.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLRY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.71%
• 1Y: 29.59%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFM vs. GLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-9.50%	-8.98%	17.54%	21.81%	-27.36%	2.08%
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	17.07%	16.50%	16.59%	19.58%	-22.50%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFM and GLRY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between TMFM and GLRY has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TMFM vs. GLRY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMFM	GLRY
Technology	28.5%	32.3%
Healthcare	23.9%	8.1%
Industrials	21.4%	24.6%
Financial Services	14.0%	10.2%
Real Estate	5.1%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Energy	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

TMFM vs. GLRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFM

TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 2
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GLRY

GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 49
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFM vs. GLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMFM	GLRY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	1.64	-2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	2.24	-3.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.29	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	2.73	-3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	9.48	-10.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMFM vs. GLRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFM Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the GLRY Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFM and GLRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMFM	GLRY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98	1.64	-2.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	0.52	-0.66

Drawdowns

TMFM vs. GLRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum GLRY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and GLRY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFM	GLRY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.75%	-40.60%	+8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.34%	-10.89%	-16.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.75%	-20.50%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.35%	0.00%	-26.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-16.04%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.65%	3.13%	+11.52%

Volatility

TMFM vs. GLRY - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) at 5.62%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFM	GLRY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.99%	5.62%	+2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.54%	15.14%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.76%	18.19%	+0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	20.06%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.63%	21.41%	-0.78%

TMFM vs. GLRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMFM and GLRY have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

TMFM vs. GLRY - Dividend Comparison

TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than GLRY's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF	0.24%	0.34%	0.52%	1.07%	1.04%	4.00%
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.07%	0.06%	16.27%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFM and GLRY in my portfolio?

TMFM and GLRY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFM or GLRY?

TMFM has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to GLRY (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs GLRY's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, TMFM or GLRY?

On 3-year performance, GLRY leads with 20.95% vs 3.39% for TMFM. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, GLRY has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFM or GLRY?

Over the 3-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFM or GLRY?

TMFM and GLRY have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFM or GLRY?

GLRY has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.

What is the main difference between TMFM and GLRY?

TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLRY is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Inspire.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.