TMFE vs. OILK
TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFE returned 18.83%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
TMFE vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
TMFE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
TMFE vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 1.48% | 11.10% | 27.95% | 41.12% | -25.84% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFE and OILK is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TMFE and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
TMFE vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFE
OILK
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TMFE
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
TMFE
OILK
Communication Services
TMFE
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
TMFE
OILK
-
Financial Services
TMFE
OILK
-
Healthcare
TMFE
OILK
-
Industrials
TMFE
OILK
-
Basic Materials
TMFE
OILK
-
Energy
TMFE
-
OILK
-
Real Estate
TMFE
-
OILK
-
Utilities
TMFE
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFE vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
TMFE
OILK
TMFE vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 3.42 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 6.91 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.06 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.12 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
TMFE vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -83.76% | +52.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -17.35% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -23.42% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -3.66% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -32.61% | +24.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 8.56% | -5.54% |
Volatility
TMFE vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) is 2.84%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that TMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFE | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 10.44% | -7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 23.26% | -14.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 28.75% | -16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 30.12% | -10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 35.97% | -16.71% |
TMFE vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFE vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFE and OILK have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to TMFE (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.07% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 19.03% vs 18.83% for TMFE. On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TMFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.31% for TMFE.
TMFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. TMFE tracks Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFE and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer