PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFE vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFE vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


TMFE

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.24%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFE vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TMFE
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF
1.48%11.10%27.95%41.12%-25.84%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFE and OILK is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022

-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TMFE and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

TMFE vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFE
OILK

Technology

30.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

18.1%
100.0%

Communication Services

16.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.8%

-

Financial Services

9.4%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Industrials

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TMFE
30.0%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMFE
18.1%
OILK
100.0%

Communication Services

TMFE
16.1%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

TMFE
10.8%
OILK

-

Financial Services

TMFE
9.4%
OILK

-

Healthcare

TMFE
9.3%
OILK

-

Industrials

TMFE
4.5%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

TMFE
1.9%
OILK

-

Energy

TMFE

-

OILK

-

Real Estate

TMFE

-

OILK

-

Utilities

TMFE

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFE vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFE
TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFE vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFEOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

3.42

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

6.91

-4.42

TMFE vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFE and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFEOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

2.06

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.12

+0.39

Drawdowns

TMFE vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFEOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-83.76%

+52.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-17.35%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-23.42%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-3.66%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-32.61%

+24.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

8.56%

-5.54%

Volatility

TMFE vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) is 2.84%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that TMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFEOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

10.44%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

23.26%

-14.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

28.75%

-16.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

30.12%

-10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

35.97%

-16.71%

TMFE vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFE vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
TMFE
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF
0.31%0.32%0.44%0.45%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFE and OILK have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to TMFE (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.07% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 19.03% vs 18.83% for TMFE. On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TMFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.31% for TMFE.

TMFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. TMFE tracks Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFE and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer