TMFE vs. AFOS
TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
TMFE vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
TMFE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFE vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 1.48% | 5.34% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFE and AFOS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFE vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
TMFE
AFOS
TMFE vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 4.35 | -3.84 |
Drawdowns
TMFE vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -11.52% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.29% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -1.37% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFE vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 20.19% | -8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 20.19% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 20.19% | -0.93% |
TMFE vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFE vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFE and AFOS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFE.
TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for TMFE and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer