TMFE vs. AFOS
TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
TMFE vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 30.38% return.
TMFE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 30.38%
- 6M
- 28.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFE vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | -0.93% | 5.93% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 30.38% | 37.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFE and AFOS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFE vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
TMFE
AFOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFE vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFE vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -11.52% | -19.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -4.68% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -1.43% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFE vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 21.51% | -9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.51% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.51% | -2.28% |
TMFE vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFE vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than AFOS's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFE and AFOS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFE.
TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for TMFE and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer