PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMED vs. SAPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMED vs. SAPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMED achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than SAPH's -17.92% return.


TMED

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.90%
6M
13.93%
YTD
14.31%
1Y
41.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.40%

SAPH

1D
3.76%
1M
15.94%
6M
-3.64%
YTD
-17.92%
1Y
-30.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-19.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.72K$23.56K$21.56K
$590.48K$387.83K$177.93K

TMED vs. SAPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
14.31%19.49%
SAPH
ADRhedged SAP ETF
-17.92%-19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TMED and SAPH is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMED vs. SAPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMED
TMED Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMED Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMED Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SAPH
SAPH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SAPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAPH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SAPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAPH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMED vs. SAPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMEDSAPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.87

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

-0.64

+4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

-1.03

+13.87

TMED vs. SAPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMED Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the SAPH Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMED and SAPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMED vs. SAPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum SAPH drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and SAPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMEDSAPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-51.72%

+40.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-47.02%

+35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-38.46%

+34.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-23.24%

+20.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

29.12%

-25.86%

Volatility

TMED vs. SAPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) is 4.81%, while ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that TMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMEDSAPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

15.45%

-10.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

29.44%

-15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.29%

37.56%

-19.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

35.58%

-17.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

35.58%

-17.47%

TMED vs. SAPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SAPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMED vs. SAPH - Dividend Comparison

TMED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SAPH's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025
SAPH
ADRhedged SAP ETF
3.40%0.00%
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
0.48%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMED and SAPH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAPH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to TMED (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMED dropped -11.11% vs SAPH's -51.72%.

On 1-year performance, TMED leads with 41.69% vs -30.02% for SAPH. On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TMED has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TMED has performed better with a 41.69% return vs -30.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.

SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.48% for TMED.

TMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SAPH is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.19% for SAPH.

TMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMED and SAPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer