TMDIX vs. SCHM
TMDIX (AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both funds - TMDIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Over the past 10 years, TMDIX returned 13.33%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for SCHM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMDIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.
Performance
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMDIX achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TMDIX has outperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 13.33%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.91% annualized return.
TMDIX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- -0.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
SCHM
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 6.08% | -1.76% | 10.84% | 25.07% | -22.26% | 16.75% | 33.42% | 63.26% | -4.28% | 22.66% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 21.21% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDIX and SCHM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TMDIX and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMDIX vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank
TMDIX
SCHM
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMDIX | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.37 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.75 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 14.98 | -15.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDIX and SCHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDIX | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.73% | -42.43% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.45% | -9.32% | -16.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -23.27% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.53% | -26.46% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.44% | -42.43% | +6.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.18% | 0.00% | -11.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -5.64% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 2.33% | +10.08% |
Volatility
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 5.46%. This indicates that TMDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMDIX | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 5.46% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 12.47% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 16.23% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 19.65% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 20.51% | +0.63% |
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMDIX vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
TMDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.20% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.08% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 29.72% | 18.28% | 31.06% | 16.38% | 14.44% | 5.90% | 7.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMDIX and SCHM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMDIX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to SCHM (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDIX dropped -48.73% vs SCHM's -42.43%.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMDIX and SCHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer