TMB vs. RDFI
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and RDFI (Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for RDFI.
Performance
TMB vs. RDFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDFI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 8.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. RDFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.34% |
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and RDFI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. RDFI — Risk / Return Rank
TMB
RDFI
TMB vs. RDFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.77 | 0.76 | +5.01 |
Drawdowns
TMB vs. RDFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum RDFI drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and RDFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -23.71% | +23.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -3.08% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -7.20% | +7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility
TMB vs. RDFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 7.05% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 8.15% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 7.95% | -5.49% |
TMB vs. RDFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RDFI's 3.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. RDFI - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than RDFI's 8.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 8.32% | 8.17% | 8.14% | 7.38% | 4.70% | 6.78% | 1.01% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and RDFI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 3.69% for RDFI.
RDFI has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Rareview Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 3.69% for RDFI.
Find the right allocation for TMB and RDFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer