TMB vs. MANI
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and MANI (Man Active Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MANI.
Performance
TMB vs. MANI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.68% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and MANI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMB vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum MANI drawdown of -1.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and MANI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -1.54% | +0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.54% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.11% | -0.06% |
Volatility
TMB vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 2.71% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 2.71% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 2.71% | +0.81% |
TMB vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than MANI's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.00% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and MANI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
MANI has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.85% for MANI.
Find the right allocation for TMB and MANI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer