TMAR vs. ENFR
TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TMAR returned 22.71% vs 25.06% for ENFR. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
TMAR vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAR achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.18% return.
TMAR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- 23.18%
- 6M
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 28.30%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
TMAR vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March | 12.21% | 15.97% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.18% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAR and ENFR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.01 |
The correlation between TMAR and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAR vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
TMAR
ENFR
TMAR vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMAR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.29 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 2.91 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.50 | 7.39 | +16.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMAR vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.93%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAR and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -68.28% | +58.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -8.64% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -6.04% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -15.93% | +15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 3.40% | -2.43% |
Volatility
TMAR vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.68%. This indicates that TMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.68% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 11.71% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 14.91% | -4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 19.26% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 24.68% | -12.37% |
TMAR vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAR vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
TMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.07% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAR and ENFR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMAR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to ENFR (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAR dropped -9.93% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 25.06% vs 22.71% for TMAR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 22.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.00% for TMAR.
TMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. TMAR tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TMAR and 0.35% for ENFR.
TMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMAR and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer