PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAAX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 20.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TMAAX having a 10.00% annualized return and MHELX not far behind at 9.58%.


TMAAX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.21%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.00%

MHELX

1D
0.50%
1M
4.53%
YTD
20.86%
6M
19.40%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
7.22%15.13%19.29%17.06%-17.79%15.74%14.13%21.47%-6.30%11.50%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
20.86%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAAX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between TMAAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMAAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAAX
TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMAAXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.80

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

16.13

-4.95

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMAAXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-61.24%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-8.52%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.37%

-30.81%

+16.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-32.01%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.99%

-39.02%

+12.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-12.91%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.53%

-0.80%

Volatility

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) is 4.21%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that TMAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMAAXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

5.62%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

15.78%

-7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

19.69%

-8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

21.09%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.30%

20.98%

-7.68%

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMAAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, more than MHELX's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
5.97%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
6.80%7.29%11.82%3.55%3.03%6.94%4.16%6.27%6.01%1.10%0.99%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMAAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to TMAAX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAAX dropped -50.54% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMAAX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer