TMAAX vs. DGIFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TMAAX (Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A) and DGIFX (Disciplined Growth Investors Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX returned 9.78%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for DGIFX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMAAX charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DGIFX.

Performance

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 16.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.

TMAAX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.85%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: 17.78%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 9.78%

DGIFX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 16.26%
• 6M: 14.08%
• 1Y: 24.11%
• 3Y*: 17.48%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A	8.59%	15.13%	19.29%	17.06%	-17.79%	15.74%	14.13%	21.47%	-6.30%	11.50%
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	16.26%	3.54%	21.13%	33.10%	-18.35%	9.59%	24.07%	23.97%	-2.39%	14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAAX and DGIFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2011	0.87

The correlation between TMAAX and DGIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMAAX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAAX

TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DGIFX

DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 31
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMAAX	DGIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.58	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.23	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.27	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.24	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.87	6.96	+5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAAX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMAAX	DGIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.58	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.48	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.66	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.70	-0.24

Drawdowns

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than DGIFX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and DGIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMAAX	DGIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.54%	-30.93%	-19.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-10.91%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.37%	-30.93%	+16.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.55%	-30.93%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.99%	-30.93%	+3.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-1.01%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-5.90%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	3.50%	-1.81%

Volatility

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) is 2.77%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that TMAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMAAX	DGIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	4.38%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	11.18%	-3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	15.51%	-5.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.88%	21.12%	-7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	18.66%	-5.34%

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMAAX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, less than DGIFX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGIFX Disciplined Growth Investors Fund	7.09%	8.29%	20.95%	2.78%	2.21%	11.12%	10.09%	3.53%	3.74%	4.29%	0.00%	0.00%
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A	6.71%	7.29%	11.82%	3.55%	3.03%	6.94%	4.16%	6.27%	6.01%	1.10%	0.99%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMAAX and DGIFX in my portfolio?

TMAAX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMAAX or DGIFX?

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to TMAAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAAX dropped -50.54% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.