TLTX vs. EINC
TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. TLTX is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TLTX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
TLTX vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.85% return.
TLTX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- 24.85%
- 6M
- 24.98%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
TLTX vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 1.95% | 6.02% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.85% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTX and EINC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTX vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
TLTX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC
TLTX vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTX | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTX vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTX | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -87.55% | +81.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -5.35% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -44.14% | +41.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility
TLTX vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTX | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.28% | 15.11% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 19.55% | -10.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 25.43% | -16.15% |
TLTX vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTX vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.11%, more than EINC's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 17.11% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTX and EINC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.11%, compared with 3.55% for EINC.
TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for TLTX and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer