PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTX vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTX vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTX achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.32% return.


TLTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-3.45%
6M
-2.30%
YTD
-1.59%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCMT

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.50%
6M
21.40%
YTD
26.32%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTX vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLTX and DCMT is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTX vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTX vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTXDCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

1.85

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

6.54

-5.23

TLTX vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTX and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTX vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTX drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTX and DCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTXDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-15.96%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-15.96%

+9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

-9.33%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-3.54%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

4.51%

-1.68%

Volatility

TLTX vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) is 2.87%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that TLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTXDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

5.79%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

16.87%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

18.76%

-9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

16.01%

-6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

16.01%

-6.77%

TLTX vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTX vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

TLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.73%, more than DCMT's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.91%3.67%1.59%
TLTX
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF
17.73%7.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTX and DCMT have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCMT has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to TLTX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTX dropped -6.35% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 29.43% vs 3.72% for TLTX. On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TLTX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 29.43% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 17.73%, compared with 2.91% for DCMT.

TLTX is categorized as Government Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TLTX and 0.66% for DCMT.

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTX and DCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer