TLTP vs. BTCI

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

TLTP (Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTP is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. TLTP is passively managed, while BTCI is actively managed. Over the past year, TLTP returned 0.30% vs -38.83% for BTCI. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TLTP charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

TLTP vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -23.79% return.

TLTP

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -2.08%
• 6M: -1.92%
• YTD: -1.56%
• 1Y: 0.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.18%

BTCI

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.32%
• 6M: -10.60%
• YTD: -23.79%
• 1Y: -38.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	$11.16M	$12.17M	$21.35M
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	$1.01M	$673.94K	$652.53K

TLTP vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	-1.56%	5.39%	-3.31%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-23.79%	-1.09%	23.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and BTCI is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.03

Return for Risk

TLTP vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTP

TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 10
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 11

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTP vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLTP	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	-0.98	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	-1.37	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.84	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	-0.80	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	-1.25	+1.37

TLTP vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -48.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTP	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-48.42%	+39.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.76%	-48.42%	+42.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-43.65%	+38.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-17.99%	+14.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	31.16%	-28.61%

Volatility

TLTP vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) is 1.92%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that TLTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLTP	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	6.58%	-4.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.38%	30.03%	-24.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.16%	39.95%	-32.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.62%	39.56%	-29.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.62%	39.56%	-29.94%

TLTP vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLTP vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.70%, less than BTCI's 40.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	40.21%	36.46%	6.76%
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF	13.70%	12.53%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLTP and BTCI in my portfolio?

TLTP and BTCI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLTP or BTCI?

BTCI has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to TLTP (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTP dropped -8.54% vs BTCI's -48.42%.

Which ETF is better, TLTP or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, TLTP leads with 0.30% vs -38.83% for BTCI. On fees, TLTP is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TLTP has been the lower-risk option at 1.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TLTP or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, TLTP has performed better with a 0.30% return vs -38.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLTP or BTCI?

TLTP is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLTP or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 40.21%, compared with 13.70% for TLTP.

What is the main difference between TLTP and BTCI?

TLTP is categorized as Government Bonds, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TLTP and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TLTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.