PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTP vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TLTP vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TLTP vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's -1.06% return.


TLTP

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.53%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FALN

1D
1.04%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TLTP vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TLTP vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTP
TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTP vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTPFALNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

0.92

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

1.31

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.22

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.15

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.54

4.96

-4.42

TLTP vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and FALN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTPFALNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.92

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.72

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and FALN is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TLTP vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than FALN's 6.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TLTP
Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF
12.78%12.53%2.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.51%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and FALN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTPFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-29.22%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-5.57%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-2.83%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.37%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

1.29%

+2.43%

Volatility

TLTP vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) at 2.77%. This indicates that TLTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TLTPFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.77%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

3.53%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.37%

6.90%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.18%

7.28%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.18%

9.01%

+1.17%