PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTP vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTP vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTP achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.49% return.


TLTP

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.22%
6M
-0.63%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTP vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLTP and BIL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTP vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTP
TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTP vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTPBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-172.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

87.91

-86.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

355.35

-354.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

2,817.77

-2,814.58

TLTP vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTP and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTPBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

19.71

-18.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

2.78

-2.68

Drawdowns

TLTP vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTP drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTP and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTPBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-0.78%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-0.01%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

0.00%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-0.26%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

0.00%

+2.12%

Volatility

TLTP vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that TLTP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTPBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

0.05%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.10%

0.13%

+4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.62%

0.20%

+7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.84%

0.26%

+9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.84%

0.26%

+9.58%

TLTP vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTP has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTP vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

TLTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
TLTP
Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF
13.16%12.53%2.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTP and BIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTP has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTP dropped -8.54% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 1-year performance, TLTP leads with 6.77% vs 3.87% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLTP has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TLTP.

TLTP has the higher dividend yield at 13.16%, compared with 3.86% for BIL.

TLTP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TLTP and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTP and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer