PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTE vs. EMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTE vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TLTE has outperformed EMDV with an annualized return of 7.90%, while EMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.


TLTE

1D
0.91%
1M
-1.41%
6M
6.23%
YTD
15.71%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.90%
ALL TIME*
5.51%

EMDV

1D
0.66%
1M
4.99%
6M
0.40%
YTD
2.19%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*
1.83%
ALL TIME*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.02K$6.25K$10.42K
$291.32K$272.95K$346.48K

TLTE vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
15.71%30.21%3.53%13.62%-17.31%4.79%12.10%14.51%-17.44%32.82%
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
2.19%11.90%0.06%-1.03%-18.19%1.11%-0.09%14.93%-7.52%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTE and EMDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2016

0.81

The correlation between TLTE and EMDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TLTE vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTE
EMDV

Technology

34.6%
22.8%

Financial Services

18.7%
24.0%

Industrials

10.1%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
6.7%

Basic Materials

7.0%
2.5%

Communication Services

4.2%
5.8%

Real Estate

3.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
14.4%

Energy

3.1%

-

Healthcare

2.6%
8.4%

Utilities

2.4%
8.8%

Technology

TLTE
34.6%
EMDV
22.8%

Financial Services

TLTE
18.7%
EMDV
24.0%

Industrials

TLTE
10.1%
EMDV
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTE
9.9%
EMDV
6.7%

Basic Materials

TLTE
7.0%
EMDV
2.5%

Communication Services

TLTE
4.2%
EMDV
5.8%

Real Estate

TLTE
3.8%
EMDV

-

Consumer Defensive

TLTE
3.6%
EMDV
14.4%

Energy

TLTE
3.1%
EMDV

-

Healthcare

TLTE
2.6%
EMDV
8.4%

Utilities

TLTE
2.4%
EMDV
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTE vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLTE
TLTE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TLTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDV
EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLTE vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLTEEMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.11

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

0.94

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

2.24

+4.89

TLTE vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTE and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLTE vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, which is greater than EMDV's maximum drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and EMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTEEMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.21%

-39.20%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-7.24%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-20.71%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

-33.37%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

-39.20%

-5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.55%

-13.94%

+5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-13.59%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

3.04%

+1.25%

Volatility

TLTE vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that TLTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTEEMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

3.09%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.72%

9.92%

+10.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.54%

11.68%

+10.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

15.42%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

17.99%

+0.74%

TLTE vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTE vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than EMDV's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
1.89%2.46%2.79%1.88%3.68%2.12%3.12%2.38%1.27%2.09%2.87%0.00%
TLTE
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index
3.38%3.76%3.73%4.03%4.42%3.21%1.95%3.23%3.02%2.12%2.30%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTE and EMDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTE has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to EMDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

On 10-year performance, TLTE leads with 7.90% vs 1.83% for EMDV. On fees, TLTE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TLTE has performed better with a 7.90% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 1.89% for EMDV.

TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.60% for EMDV.

TLTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTE and EMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer