TLTD vs. POW
TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLTD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. TLTD is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLTD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
TLTD vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.
TLTD
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
POW
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- 6M
- 34.18%
- YTD
- 41.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTD vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 8.79% | 4.24% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 41.57% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTD and POW is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTD vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
TLTD
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TLTD vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTD vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.62% | -18.37% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -16.82% | +14.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -4.40% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility
TLTD vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 32.91% | -18.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 32.91% | -16.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 32.91% | -16.40% |
TLTD vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTD vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 3.36% | 3.44% | 3.88% | 3.39% | 2.76% | 3.44% | 2.04% | 3.46% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTD and POW have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
TLTD is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for TLTD and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer