PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLTD vs. HAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLTD vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 31.10% return.


TLTD

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.60%
YTD
8.45%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
9.50%

HAIL

1D
-2.34%
1M
16.87%
YTD
31.10%
6M
29.05%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
-5.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTD vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
8.45%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%21.26%-17.57%0.39%
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
31.10%19.62%-6.98%9.65%-45.72%1.95%84.33%30.63%-19.96%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TLTD and HAIL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.69

The correlation between TLTD and HAIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

TLTD vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLTD
HAIL

Financial Services

32.7%
1.9%

Industrials

13.5%
20.2%

Technology

10.3%
33.1%

Energy

7.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

7.4%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
34.2%

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.5%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Communication Services

2.0%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Financial Services

TLTD
32.7%
HAIL
1.9%

Industrials

TLTD
13.5%
HAIL
20.2%

Technology

TLTD
10.3%
HAIL
33.1%

Energy

TLTD
7.7%
HAIL
4.4%

Basic Materials

TLTD
7.4%
HAIL
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TLTD
5.6%
HAIL
34.2%

Healthcare

TLTD
4.2%
HAIL

-

Consumer Defensive

TLTD
3.5%
HAIL

-

Utilities

TLTD
3.3%
HAIL

-

Communication Services

TLTD
2.0%
HAIL
4.9%

Real Estate

TLTD
0.9%
HAIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLTD vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

HAIL
HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTD vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLTDHAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.14

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

9.49

-1.00

TLTD vs. HAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HAIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLTD and HAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLTDHAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.00

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

-0.17

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.20

+0.31

Drawdowns

TLTD vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and HAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLTDHAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-65.98%

+25.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-18.64%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-40.96%

+27.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.96%

-63.12%

+34.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-30.85%

+28.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-31.60%

+23.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

6.15%

-3.00%

Volatility

TLTD vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.34%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLTDHAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

10.80%

-6.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

22.28%

-10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

29.32%

-14.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

31.80%

-15.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

31.73%

-14.92%

TLTD vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLTD vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison

TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than HAIL's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAIL
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF
1.44%2.00%2.98%2.62%2.09%1.36%0.52%1.17%2.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.08%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLTD and HAIL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIL has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to TLTD (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs HAIL's -65.98%.

On 5-year performance, TLTD leads with 9.51% vs -5.36% for HAIL. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TLTD has performed better with a 9.51% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HAIL.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 1.44% for HAIL.

TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.45% for HAIL.

HAIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLTD and HAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer