TLT vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - TLT tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. TLT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.

Performance

TLT vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TLT

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: -1.27%
• 1Y: 3.48%
• 3Y*: -1.67%
• 5Y*: -6.27%
• 10Y*: -1.56%

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLT vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	-0.86%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

TLT vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLT

TLT Risk / Return Rank: 14
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLT vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLT	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLT	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	—	—

Drawdowns

TLT vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLT	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.35%	0.00%	-48.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.31%	0.00%	-40.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	0.00%	-13.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLT	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.77%	0.00%	+9.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	0.00%	+15.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.90%	0.00%	+14.90%

TLT vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TLT vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	4.58%	4.43%	4.30%	3.38%	2.67%	1.50%	1.50%	2.27%	2.63%	2.43%	2.60%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, TLT or IBTE?

On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLT or IBTE?

IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLT or IBTE?

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between TLT and IBTE?

TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLT and 0.07% for IBTE.