TLRIX vs. AYBLX
TLRIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TLRIX returned 6.25%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLRIX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.
Performance
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLRIX achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TLRIX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 6.25%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.
TLRIX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
AYBLX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLRIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund | 3.85% | 11.79% | 7.65% | 10.80% | -12.53% | 7.06% | 11.10% | 15.31% | -3.87% | 10.39% |
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 13.99% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -4.43% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLRIX and AYBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2007 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TLRIX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLRIX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank
TLRIX
AYBLX
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund (TLRIX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLRIX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.62 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 5.16 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 24.00 | -13.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLRIX drawdown since its inception was -26.71%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLRIX and AYBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLRIX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.71% | -36.28% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -6.41% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.02% | -13.39% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.15% | -20.26% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.15% | -24.24% | +7.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.52% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -3.78% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 1.38% | -0.25% |
Volatility
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund (TLRIX) is 2.21%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that TLRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLRIX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 3.63% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | 7.83% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.87% | 9.95% | -4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.76% | 11.13% | -4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 11.33% | -4.49% |
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLRIX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLRIX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison
TLRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.24% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
TLRIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund | 4.42% | 5.23% | 3.53% | 3.32% | 6.10% | 7.66% | 5.77% | 3.85% | 6.04% | 2.13% | 3.75% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, TLRIX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AYBLX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to TLRIX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLRIX dropped -26.71% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLRIX and AYBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer