TLLIX vs. TLXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX).
TLLIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TLXIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | -4.26% | 20.75% | 15.17% | 20.53% | -17.52% | 17.12% | 17.20% | 26.04% | -7.05% | 19.20% |
TLXIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund | -4.07% | 20.13% | 14.63% | 20.06% | -17.26% | 16.63% | 17.02% | 25.84% | -6.96% | 18.87% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TLLIX having a -4.26% return and TLXIX slightly higher at -4.07%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TLLIX having a 10.65% annualized return and TLXIX not far behind at 10.45%.
TLLIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
TLXIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLLIX and TLXIX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLLIX vs. TLXIX — Risk / Return Rank
TLLIX
TLXIX
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLLIX | TLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.60 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 6.09 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLLIX | TLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.69 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLLIX and TLXIX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Dividend Comparison
TLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than TLXIX's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | 3.26% | 3.12% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 1.71% | 2.25% | 2.67% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 0.27% |
TLXIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund | 3.37% | 3.24% | 2.33% | 2.07% | 2.49% | 2.51% | 1.77% | 2.25% | 2.69% | 0.16% | 2.59% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLLIX drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, roughly equal to the maximum TLXIX drawdown of -31.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLIX and TLXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLLIX | TLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -31.08% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -10.34% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -24.97% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.41% | -31.08% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -8.45% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -4.06% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.29% | +0.09% |
Volatility
TLLIX vs. TLXIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2045 Fund (TLXIX) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLLIX | TLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 4.51% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 8.16% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 14.49% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 13.86% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 15.09% | +0.37% |