PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TLH vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TLH vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TLH (iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLH returned -0.87%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for SMH. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. TLH charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

TLH vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLH achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TLH has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -0.87%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.

TLH

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
0.36%
5Y*
-3.89%
10Y*
-0.87%

SMH

1D
-9.22%
1M
3.63%
YTD
58.19%
6M
56.81%
1Y
127.40%
3Y*
58.39%
5Y*
36.10%
10Y*
36.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLH vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF		-0.95%6.47%-4.21%4.03%-25.24%-5.38%13.78%10.11%0.37%4.21%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		58.19%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TLH and SMH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2007

-0.22

The correlation between TLH and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

Often compared with TLH:
TLH vs. TLTTLH vs. VGLTTLH vs. IEITLH vs. SPTLTLH vs. SCHQTLH vs. PLWTLH vs. XTLH.TO
Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK

Return for Risk

TLH vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TLH
TLH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLH vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TLHSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.45
4.00

-3.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.69
4.12

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.59

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

8.58

-8.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

32.42

-30.93

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLH vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLH Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLH and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TLHSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

4.00

-3.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

1.03

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

1.11

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.32

-0.05

Drawdowns

TLH vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLH drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLH and SMH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TLHSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-84.96%

+43.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-14.93%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-35.74%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

-45.30%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

-45.30%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.13%

-10.69%

-19.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-41.08%

+30.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.94%

-1.57%

Volatility

TLH vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) is 2.37%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that TLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TLHSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

14.88%

-12.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.52%

26.35%

-20.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

32.03%

-24.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.69%

35.24%

-22.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

32.70%

-21.51%

TLH vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLH vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.19%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF		4.50%4.17%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

TLH and SMH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to TLH (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLH dropped -41.14% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.02% vs -0.87% for TLH. On fees, TLH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLH has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.02% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

TLH has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.

TLH is categorized as Government Bonds, while SMH is Semiconductors. TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TLH and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLH and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer