PortfoliosLab logo
TLH vs. PLW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TLH and PLW is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

TLH vs. PLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


TLH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PLW

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TLH vs. PLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PLW's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TLH vs. PLW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TLH is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TLH is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TLH is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TLH is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TLH is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TLH is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PLW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLW is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLW is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLW is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLW is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLW is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLW is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TLH vs. PLW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) and Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

TLH vs. PLW - Dividend Comparison

TLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, while PLW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLW
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TLH vs. PLW - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

TLH vs. PLW - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...