PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLG vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLG vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLG

1D
2.60%
1M
6.83%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

OUSA

1D
1.27%
1M
3.71%
6M
5.67%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$880.04K$1.30M$1.44M
$169.84K$227.64K$177.78K

TLG vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLG and OUSA is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLG vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLG vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLGOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

TLG vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLG vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLG drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLG and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLGOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-33.12%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-3.50%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

Volatility

TLG vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLGOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.19%

10.31%

+13.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

13.39%

+10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.19%

15.20%

+8.99%

TLG vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLG has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLG vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

TLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.33%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
TLG
Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLG and OUSA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for TLG.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for TLG.

TLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for TLG and 0.48% for OUSA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLG and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer