TLFIX vs. FRAMX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund (TLFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX).
TLFIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. FRAMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007.
Performance
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLFIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund | -1.91% | 12.94% | 8.04% | 12.24% | -13.81% | 7.83% | 12.58% | 16.71% | -3.31% | 10.10% |
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | -0.57% | 9.55% | 4.04% | 7.80% | -11.87% | 2.52% | 8.30% | 10.28% | -2.05% | 6.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLFIX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, TLFIX has outperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.65% annualized return.
TLFIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
FRAMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLFIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TLFIX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank
TLFIX
FRAMX
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund (TLFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLFIX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 2.09 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.00 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 8.06 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLFIX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.41 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.82 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.49 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLFIX and FRAMX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison
TLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, more than FRAMX's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLFIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund | 8.16% | 8.00% | 7.99% | 4.01% | 3.39% | 5.16% | 2.71% | 2.44% | 3.23% | 0.17% | 2.42% | 0.26% |
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | 2.91% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.58% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 4.40% | 8.26% | 1.42% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLFIX drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLFIX and FRAMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLFIX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -33.94% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.20% | -3.45% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.10% | -16.31% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.10% | -16.31% | -2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -3.20% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -3.87% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 0.86% | +0.34% |
Volatility
TLFIX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund (TLFIX) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.96%. This indicates that TLFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLFIX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 1.96% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.15% | 2.86% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.09% | 4.59% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.86% | 5.21% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.45% | 4.47% | +3.98% |