PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLFIX vs. VINIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund (TLFIX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares (VINIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLFIX achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than VINIX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TLFIX has underperformed VINIX with an annualized return of 6.80%, while VINIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.


TLFIX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.12%
YTD
5.57%
6M
6.12%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
6.80%

VINIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.73%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*
15.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLFIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund
5.57%12.94%8.04%12.24%-13.81%7.83%12.58%16.71%-3.31%10.10%
VINIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.69%17.85%26.28%25.77%-18.15%28.67%18.40%31.46%-4.42%21.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TLFIX and VINIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009

0.91

The correlation between TLFIX and VINIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLFIX vs. VINIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLFIX
TLFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TLFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TLFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VINIX
VINIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VINIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VINIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VINIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VINIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VINIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund (TLFIX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares (VINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLFIXVINIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.52

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

3.42

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.35

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.38

15.68

-1.30

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the VINIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLFIX and VINIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLFIXVINIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.86

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.87

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.61

+0.20

Drawdowns

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLFIX drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum VINIX drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLFIX and VINIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLFIXVINIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.10%

-55.19%

+36.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.76%

-8.90%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.64%

-18.75%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.10%

-24.51%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.10%

-33.79%

+14.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-8.53%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.90%

-0.84%

Volatility

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund (TLFIX) is 1.99%, while Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares (VINIX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that TLFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLFIXVINIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.83%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.70%

8.98%

-4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.79%

11.86%

-6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.90%

16.89%

-7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.48%

18.06%

-9.58%

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLFIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VINIX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLFIX vs. VINIX - Dividend Comparison

TLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than VINIX's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLFIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2015 Fund
7.58%8.00%7.99%4.01%3.39%5.16%2.71%2.44%3.23%0.17%2.42%0.26%
VINIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.40%2.10%3.64%2.65%3.38%4.77%3.06%2.85%2.43%1.82%2.36%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLFIX and VINIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VINIX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to TLFIX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLFIX dropped -19.10% vs VINIX's -55.19%.

TLFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLFIX and VINIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer