PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLCI vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLCI vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLCI achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.


TLCI

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.02%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLCI vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLCI and IBIC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLCI vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLCI
TLCI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TLCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLCI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TLCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLCI vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLCIIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

2.22

-1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

16.56

-16.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

58.67

-58.35

TLCI vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLCI and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLCI vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLCI drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLCI and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLCIIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-0.90%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-0.27%

-11.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-0.08%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-0.10%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

0.08%

+3.80%

Volatility

TLCI vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that TLCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLCIIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

0.17%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

0.67%

+10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

0.89%

+12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

1.56%

+14.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

1.56%

+14.10%

TLCI vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLCI has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLCI vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

TLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%
TLCI
Touchstone International Equity ETF
0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLCI and IBIC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLCI has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLCI dropped -12.15% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs 1.24% for TLCI. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs 1.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for TLCI.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.60% for TLCI.

TLCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TLCI and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLCI and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer