PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLCI vs. LCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLCI vs. LCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) and Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLCI achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than LCF's 5.23% return.


TLCI

1D
0.24%
1M
2.55%
YTD
0.09%
6M
1.37%
1Y
0.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LCF

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.89%
YTD
5.23%
6M
6.34%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLCI vs. LCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLCI and LCF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.63

The correlation between TLCI and LCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLCI vs. LCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLCI
TLCI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TLCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLCI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TLCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLCI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLCI vs. LCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) and Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLCILCFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

1.91

-1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

2.67

-2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.34

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.96

-1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.15

8.14

-7.99

TLCI vs. LCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the LCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLCI and LCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLCILCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

1.91

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.05

-0.85

Drawdowns

TLCI vs. LCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLCI drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum LCF drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLCI and LCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLCILCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-18.28%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-11.67%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-0.42%

-3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-2.82%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.82%

+0.99%

Volatility

TLCI vs. LCF - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) at 2.42%. This indicates that TLCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLCILCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

2.42%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

9.01%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

11.86%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

15.47%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

15.47%

+0.30%

TLCI vs. LCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLCI has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than LCF's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLCI vs. LCF - Dividend Comparison

TLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than LCF's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.52%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%
TLCI
Touchstone International Equity ETF
0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLCI and LCF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLCI has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to LCF (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLCI dropped -12.15% vs LCF's -18.28%.

On 1-year performance, LCF leads with 22.60% vs 0.21% for TLCI. On fees, TLCI is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCF has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLCI is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

TLCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.

TLCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LCF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TLCI and 0.70% for LCF.

LCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLCI and LCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer