TLA vs. QYLD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. TLA is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

TLA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TLA

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -7.40%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 5.88%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: 9.59%
• ALL TIME*: 8.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	$83.30M	$78.68M	$98.28M
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	$81.43K	$70.64K	$69.71K

TLA vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	-2.43%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TLA and QYLD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.63

Return for Risk

TLA vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 83
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLA	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.73	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.70	—

Drawdowns

TLA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLA	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.80%	-24.75%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.79%	-2.96%	-5.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-3.81%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLA	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	11.26%	+5.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	15.04%	+1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	15.63%	+1.00%

TLA vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, less than QYLD's 11.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.89%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF	8.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLA and QYLD in my portfolio?

TLA and QYLD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TLA or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TLA or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TLA or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 8.86% for TLA.

What is the main difference between TLA and QYLD?

TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.60% for QYLD.