TLA vs. QQA
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
TLA vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.94M | $6.91M | $6.83M | |
| $81.43K | $70.64K | $69.71K |
TLA vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | -2.43% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 6.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and QQA is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQA
TLA vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLA | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLA vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.80% | -19.73% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -4.91% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -2.57% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 15.25% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.67% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.67% | -2.04% |
TLA vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, less than QQA's 10.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 10.14% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 8.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and QQA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 10.14%, compared with 8.86% for TLA.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.29% for QQA.
Find the right allocation for TLA and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer