TLA vs. AMDL
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%). TLA is actively managed, while AMDL is passively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.
Performance
TLA vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- -20.60%
- 6M
- 179.62%
- YTD
- 232.67%
- 1Y
- 325.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $184.60M | $207.34M | $361.62M | |
| $81.43K | $70.64K | $69.71K |
TLA vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | -2.43% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 159.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and AMDL is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDL
TLA vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLA | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLA vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -11.80%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.80% | -88.63% | +76.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -37.49% | +28.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -46.51% | +44.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.74% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 112.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 142.48% | -125.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 120.98% | -104.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 120.98% | -104.35% |
TLA vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLA and AMDL have an expense ratio of 1.07%.
Dividends
TLA vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.86%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 0.00% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 8.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and AMDL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLA and AMDL have the same expense ratio: 1.07% per year.
TLA has the higher dividend yield at 8.86%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.
TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for TLA and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer