PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLA vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLA vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLA

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDL

1D
-21.59%
1M
15.94%
YTD
260.90%
6M
243.03%
1Y
867.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLA vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLA and AMDL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLA vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLA

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLA vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLA vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLAAMDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.37

+0.44

Drawdowns

TLA vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-88.63%

+83.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-27.12%

+25.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-48.47%

+47.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.58%

Volatility

TLA vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

97.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

131.65%

-117.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

117.43%

-103.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

117.43%

-103.01%

TLA vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLA vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TLA and AMDL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLA is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLA is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 1.15% for AMDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLA and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer