TKNQ vs. BATT

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

TKNQ (Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TKNQ is a Blockchain fund managed by Amplify, while BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TKNQ vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TKNQ achieves a -14.08% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 11.38% return.

TKNQ

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -8.75%
• YTD: -14.08%
• 6M: -14.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -11.16%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 67.59%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TKNQ vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TKNQ Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF	-14.08%	-1.55%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	11.38%	-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TKNQ and BATT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

TKNQ vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TKNQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 73
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TKNQ vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TKNQ	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.51	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.05	—

Drawdowns

TKNQ vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TKNQ drawdown since its inception was -21.83%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TKNQ and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TKNQ	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.83%	-69.38%	+47.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-47.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.99%	-14.75%	-5.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-34.56%	+21.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TKNQ	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.19%	32.72%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.19%	29.98%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.19%	30.75%	-1.56%

Dividends

TKNQ vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

TKNQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.66%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%
TKNQ Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TKNQ and BATT in my portfolio?

TKNQ and BATT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TKNQ or BATT?

BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for TKNQ.

What is the main difference between TKNQ and BATT?

TKNQ is categorized as Blockchain, while BATT is Lithium & Battery Metals.