TJUN vs. LJUL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) and LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Over the past year, TJUN returned 13.53% vs 5.58% for LJUL. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TJUN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LJUL.

Performance

TJUN vs. LJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUN achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than LJUL's 2.02% return.

TJUN

• 1D: -3.88%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUN vs. LJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	1.65%	11.79%
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	2.02%	3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUN and LJUL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

TJUN vs. LJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUN

TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 62
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 76

LJUL

LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 97
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUN vs. LJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TJUN	LJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	3.55	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	5.81	-3.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.88	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	10.68	-7.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.10	53.94	-40.84

TJUN vs. LJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the LJUL Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUN and LJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TJUN vs. LJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUN drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum LJUL drawdown of -4.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUN and LJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUN	LJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-4.85%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.47%	-0.52%	-3.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	0.00%	-3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.58%	-0.69%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.10%	+0.94%

Volatility

TJUN vs. LJUL - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) at 0.12%. This indicates that TJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUN	LJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	0.12%	+3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.42%	1.05%	+5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	1.58%	+6.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.33%	4.30%	+4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	4.30%	+4.03%

TJUN vs. LJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUN vs. LJUL - Dividend Comparison

TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	5.22%	5.36%	2.78%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUN and LJUL in my portfolio?

TJUN and LJUL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUN or LJUL?

TJUN has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to LJUL (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUN dropped -4.47% vs LJUL's -4.85%.

Which ETF is better, TJUN or LJUL?

On 1-year performance, TJUN leads with 13.53% vs 5.58% for LJUL. On fees, LJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUN or LJUL?

Over the 1-year period, TJUN has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUN or LJUL?

LJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUN or LJUL?

LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

What is the main difference between TJUN and LJUL?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TJUN and 0.79% for LJUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.