PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPZ vs. IBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPZ achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than IBIG's 1.64% return.


TIPZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
2.58%
6M
1.00%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
2.49%

IBIG

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
2.58%5.87%1.52%3.80%
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
1.64%7.90%2.60%4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPZ and IBIG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.92

The correlation between TIPZ and IBIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPZ vs. IBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPZ
TIPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TIPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIPZIBIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.74

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

12.68

-5.30

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the IBIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPZ and IBIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIPZIBIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.93

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.43

-0.91

Drawdowns

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than IBIG's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPZ and IBIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPZIBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-3.21%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-1.35%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.43%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-0.77%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.40%

+0.30%

Volatility

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) at 0.62%. This indicates that TIPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPZIBIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.62%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.70%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

2.62%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

4.29%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

4.29%

+1.55%

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPZ vs. IBIG - Dividend Comparison

TIPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than IBIG's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.89%4.70%4.15%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
5.11%4.74%4.44%4.69%7.14%4.41%1.47%1.65%2.23%1.70%1.06%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPZ and IBIG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIPZ has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to IBIG (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPZ dropped -15.77% vs IBIG's -3.21%.

On 1-year performance, TIPZ leads with 5.12% vs 5.02% for IBIG. On fees, IBIG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIPZ has performed better with a 5.12% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TIPZ.

TIPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 3.89% for IBIG.

TIPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury, while IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TIPZ and 0.10% for IBIG.

IBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPZ and IBIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer