TIPC vs. RBIL
TIPC (Northern Trust 2045 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPC is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TIPC charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
TIPC vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPC achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.69% return.
TIPC
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.56M | $1.96M | $2.33M | |
| $1.65K | $7.26K | $9.64K |
TIPC vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPC Northern Trust 2045 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | -0.23% | 1.30% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.69% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPC and RBIL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPC vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
TIPC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBIL
TIPC vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPC) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 30.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPC vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPC drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPC and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -0.56% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -0.14% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -0.08% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility
TIPC vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPC | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63% | 0.95% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 1.06% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 1.06% | +3.57% |
TIPC vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPC vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
TIPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% |
TIPC Northern Trust 2045 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 5.00% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPC and RBIL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
TIPC has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPC and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for TIPC and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer