PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIH vs. IBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIH vs. IBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than IBIL's 1.59% return.


IBIH

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.29%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIL

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.17%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIH vs. IBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIH and IBIL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

0.80

The correlation between IBIH and IBIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIH vs. IBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIL
IBIL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIH vs. IBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIHIBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.31

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

5.52

+5.39

IBIH vs. IBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the IBIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIH and IBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIHIBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.14

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.66

+0.59

Drawdowns

IBIH vs. IBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum IBIL drawdown of -5.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and IBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIHIBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-5.28%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-2.76%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.66%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-1.48%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

1.15%

-0.65%

Volatility

IBIH vs. IBIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) is 0.85%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that IBIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIHIBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.25%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

3.08%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

5.58%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

8.20%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

8.20%

-3.27%

IBIH vs. IBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIH and IBIL have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIH vs. IBIL - Dividend Comparison

IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than IBIL's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
3.90%4.68%4.34%0.70%
IBIL
iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF
3.47%2.93%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIH and IBIL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIL has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to IBIH (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIH dropped -3.94% vs IBIL's -5.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBIL leads with 6.35% vs 5.49% for IBIH. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIH has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIL has performed better with a 6.35% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIH and IBIL have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.47% for IBIL.

IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIL tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index.

IBIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIH and IBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer