TIPB vs. HYHG
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPB is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while HYHG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. TIPB is actively managed, while HYHG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TIPB vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.86% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.38%
TIPB vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.03% | 0.79% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.86% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and HYHG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYHG
TIPB vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -25.71% | +24.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -3.03% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65% | 5.57% | -2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 8.17% | -5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 9.10% | -6.45% |
Dividends
TIPB vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than HYHG's 6.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.73% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 3.04% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPB and HYHG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 3.04% for TIPB.
TIPB is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while HYHG is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and ProShares.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer