PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPB vs. AIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPB vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 68.71% return.


TIPB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AIS

1D
0.47%
1M
-14.16%
6M
49.61%
YTD
68.71%
1Y
119.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
75.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.93M$45.10M$51.04M
$2.11K$9.22K$33.66K

TIPB vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIPB and AIS is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPB vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIPB vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPBAISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

TIPB vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPB vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and AIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPBAISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-34.44%

+33.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-27.93%

+27.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-6.30%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

Volatility

TIPB vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPBAISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

47.78%

-45.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

44.01%

-41.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

44.01%

-41.41%

TIPB vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIPB vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIPB and AIS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIPB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIPB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

TIPB is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while AIS is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.75% for AIS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPB and AIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer