PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPA vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPA vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPA) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPA achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.42% return.


TIPA

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.36%
6M
1.79%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

VTP

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.33%
6M
0.31%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.26K$9.58K$152.52K
$2.36M$2.46M$2.09M

TIPA vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIPA and VTP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPA vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPA vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPA) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPAVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

TIPA vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPA vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPA drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum VTP drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPA and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPAVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-1.92%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.41%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-0.54%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

Volatility

TIPA vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPAVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60%

3.35%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.60%

3.33%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.60%

3.33%

-1.73%

TIPA vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPA vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

TIPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than VTP's 2.99% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIPA and VTP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TIPA.

TIPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.99% for VTP.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPA and 0.05% for VTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPA and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer