TIPA vs. IQDF
TIPA (Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and IQDF (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPA is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while IQDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. TIPA is actively managed, while IQDF is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIPA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IQDF.
Performance
TIPA vs. IQDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPA achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than IQDF's 14.58% return.
TIPA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQDF
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 29.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
TIPA vs. IQDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPA Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.78% | 0.52% |
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund | 14.58% | 8.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPA and IQDF is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPA vs. IQDF — Risk / Return Rank
TIPA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IQDF
TIPA vs. IQDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPA) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPA | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPA vs. IQDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPA drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum IQDF drawdown of -39.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPA and IQDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPA | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -39.83% | +39.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -2.53% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -9.29% | +9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
TIPA vs. IQDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPA | IQDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63% | 15.53% | -13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.63% | 15.72% | -14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.63% | 16.47% | -14.84% |
TIPA vs. IQDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDF's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIPA vs. IQDF - Dividend Comparison
TIPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than IQDF's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund | 3.05% | 3.27% | 6.72% | 6.06% | 5.59% | 4.13% | 3.31% | 4.46% | 5.78% | 3.89% | 3.75% | 4.27% |
TIPA Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 3.29% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPA and IQDF have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.
TIPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 3.05% for IQDF.
TIPA is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IQDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPA and 0.47% for IQDF.
Find the right allocation for TIPA and IQDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer