PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPA vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPA vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPA) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPA achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 16.19% return.


TIPA

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.36%
6M
1.79%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RLY

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.36%
6M
9.05%
YTD
16.19%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
12.80%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.42M$8.70M$8.08M
$1.26K$9.58K$152.52K

TIPA vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIPA and RLY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPA vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPA vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPA) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPARLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

TIPA vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPA vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPA drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPA and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPARLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-37.75%

+36.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-2.39%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-9.41%

+9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

TIPA vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPARLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60%

10.59%

-8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.60%

13.47%

-11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.60%

13.79%

-12.19%

TIPA vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIPA vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

TIPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than RLY's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
3.04%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
TIPA
Northern Trust 2030 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF
3.29%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPA and RLY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIPA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIPA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

TIPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 3.04% for RLY.

TIPA is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while RLY is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPA and 0.50% for RLY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPA and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer