PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L).

TIP5.L and EIMI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TIP5.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. It was launched on Apr 6, 2022. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both TIP5.L and EIMI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		0.92%6.22%4.87%4.28%-2.74%5.48%4.88%4.87%0.56%0.01%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF		0.33%32.16%7.36%11.03%-19.67%-0.65%18.80%16.37%-14.17%20.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP5.L achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 0.33% return.

TIP5.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.48%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
—

EIMI.L

1D
0.02%
1M
-11.69%
YTD
0.33%
6M
4.82%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
8.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF

Often compared with TIP5.L:
TIP5.L vs. SGOVTIP5.L vs. HPRO.LTIP5.L vs. AGGG.LTIP5.L vs. TIPG.LTIP5.L vs. GILG.LTIP5.L vs. TI5G.LTIP5.L vs. BRK-B
Often compared with EIMI.L:
EIMI.L vs. VFEA.DEEIMI.L vs. CSPX.LEIMI.L vs. AVEMEIMI.L vs. VWOEIMI.L vs. VFEG.LEIMI.L vs. AEME.LEIMI.L vs. IEEM.L

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIP5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Return for Risk

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TIP5.L
TIP5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TIP5.LEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.62

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

2.11

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.26

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.81

8.13

+0.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP5.L and EIMI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TIP5.LEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.62

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.22

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.42

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.26

+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between TIP5.L and EIMI.L is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

TIP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		5.88%5.93%6.97%5.15%0.34%0.37%3.01%3.27%2.99%1.03%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP5.L drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP5.L and EIMI.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

TIP5.LEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-38.73%

+33.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-12.66%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.21%

-35.66%

+30.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.73%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-12.64%

+12.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-14.21%

+13.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

3.52%

-3.07%

Volatility

TIP5.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) is 0.82%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that TIP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

TIP5.LEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

9.11%

-8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

13.20%

-11.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

18.47%

-15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

17.67%

-14.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.18%

18.86%

-15.68%