PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TIP vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TIP vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L), while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TIP returned 2.57%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TIP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

TIP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.57%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.

TIP

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
2.57%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF		1.54%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP and VOO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between TIP and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares TIPS Bond ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with TIP:
TIP vs. SCHPTIP vs. VTIPTIP vs. SGOVTIP vs. STIPTIP vs. FIPDXTIP vs. BNDTIP vs. IEF
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV

Return for Risk

TIP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TIPVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
2.39

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.24
3.25

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.16

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

14.73

-7.15

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIP vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TIPVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.39

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.83

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.87

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.89

-0.31

Drawdowns

TIP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TIPVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-33.99%

+19.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-8.90%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

-18.69%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

-24.52%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

-33.99%

+19.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.70%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-3.69%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

1.91%

-1.25%

Volatility

TIP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 0.89%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TIPVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

2.84%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

8.90%

-6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

11.80%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

16.81%

-10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

18.01%

-12.27%

TIP vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TIP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF		3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

TIP and VOO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to TIP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 2.57% for TIP. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TIP.

TIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

TIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. TIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TIP and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer