TIP vs. LNG
TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TIP returned 2.34%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for LNG. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TIP vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 33.71% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 2.34%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.39% annualized return.
TIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
LNG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 33.86%
- YTD
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
TIP vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.00% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 33.71% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIP and LNG is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2003 | -0.03 |
The correlation between TIP and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIP vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
TIP
LNG
TIP vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIP | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.10 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.48 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 0.90 | +3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIP vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIP | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -97.84% | +83.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -24.09% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.54% | -24.87% | +20.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | -24.87% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.51% | -57.53% | +43.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -12.69% | +11.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -43.08% | +39.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 12.88% | -12.19% |
Volatility
TIP vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 1.25%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIP | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 7.89% | -6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 22.45% | -19.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 27.34% | -23.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.20% | 30.37% | -24.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 32.28% | -26.55% |
Dividends
TIP vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than LNG's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 4.44% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIP and LNG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNG has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to TIP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs LNG's -97.84%.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIP and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer