TINY vs. PSI
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 31.25%/yr vs 57.01%/yr for PSI. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
TINY vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 107.72% return.
TINY
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 59.78%
- 6M
- 60.21%
- 1Y
- 114.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 21.18%
- YTD
- 107.72%
- 6M
- 104.36%
- 1Y
- 208.96%
- 3Y*
- 57.01%
- 5Y*
- 31.86%
- 10Y*
- 34.28%
TINY vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 59.78% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.73% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 107.72% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 18.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and PSI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TINY and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
TINY vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TINY
PSI
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TINY
PSI
Healthcare
TINY
PSI
-
Basic Materials
TINY
PSI
-
Industrials
TINY
PSI
Communication Services
TINY
-
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
TINY
-
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
TINY
-
PSI
-
Energy
TINY
-
PSI
-
Financial Services
TINY
-
PSI
-
Real Estate
TINY
-
PSI
-
Utilities
TINY
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
PSI
TINY vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.69 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.85 | 13.59 | -6.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.13 | 49.28 | -25.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 5.58 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
TINY vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -62.96% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -15.48% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -41.07% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -15.94% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 4.26% | +0.49% |
Volatility
TINY vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) is 12.04%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that TINY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 13.60% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.40% | 30.09% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 37.75% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 37.85% | -5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 35.09% | -2.72% |
TINY vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINY vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than PSI's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and PSI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to TINY (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 3-year performance, PSI leads with 57.01% vs 31.25% for TINY. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 12.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSI has performed better with a 57.01% return vs 31.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.
TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.05% for PSI.
TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 3.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer