TINY vs. PSCT
TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and PSCT (Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index while PSCT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 31.25%/yr vs 23.44%/yr for PSCT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCT.
Performance
TINY vs. PSCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than PSCT's 54.18% return.
TINY
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- 15.50%
- YTD
- 59.78%
- 6M
- 60.21%
- 1Y
- 114.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 15.45%
- YTD
- 54.18%
- 6M
- 50.59%
- 1Y
- 98.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
TINY vs. PSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 59.78% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.73% |
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 54.18% | 18.63% | -1.06% | 20.81% | -22.50% | 10.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINY and PSCT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between TINY and PSCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
TINY vs. PSCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TINY
PSCT
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TINY
PSCT
Healthcare
TINY
PSCT
-
Basic Materials
TINY
PSCT
-
Industrials
TINY
PSCT
Communication Services
TINY
-
PSCT
-
Consumer Cyclical
TINY
-
PSCT
-
Consumer Defensive
TINY
-
PSCT
-
Energy
TINY
-
PSCT
Financial Services
TINY
-
PSCT
Real Estate
TINY
-
PSCT
-
Utilities
TINY
-
PSCT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINY vs. PSCT — Risk / Return Rank
TINY
PSCT
TINY vs. PSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINY | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | 3.35 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.97 | 3.88 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.49 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.85 | 6.72 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.13 | 28.34 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINY | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 3.35 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
TINY vs. PSCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than PSCT's maximum drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and PSCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINY | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -40.44% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -14.80% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -33.96% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.18% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -7.91% | -8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 3.50% | +1.25% |
Volatility
TINY vs. PSCT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) at 9.00%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINY | PSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 9.00% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.40% | 21.05% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 29.82% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 27.68% | +4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 26.67% | +5.70% |
TINY vs. PSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCT's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINY vs. PSCT - Dividend Comparison
TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than PSCT's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.22% | 0.47% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.15% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINY and PSCT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to PSCT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs PSCT's -40.44%.
On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 23.44% for PSCT. On fees, PSCT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.
TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.
TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.29% for PSCT.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINY and PSCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer