TINY vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 30.24%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KROP. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

TINY vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 55.62% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.

TINY

• 1D: -2.60%
• 1M: 7.29%
• YTD: 55.62%
• 6M: 55.41%
• 1Y: 105.71%
• 3Y*: 30.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	55.62%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.73%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-5.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and KROP is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between TINY and KROP has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINY vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	KROP
Technology	79.0%	-
Healthcare	8.6%	0.3%
Basic Materials	7.7%	32.1%
Industrials	4.7%	39.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	26.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TINY vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 89
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINY	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	0.81	+2.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	1.24	+2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.15	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.35	1.14	+5.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.33	2.58	+19.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINY vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINY	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	0.81	+2.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	-0.57	+1.12

Drawdowns

TINY vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-61.96%	+18.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-11.29%	-5.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	-28.70%	-13.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-48.93%	+46.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.15%	-44.50%	+28.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	4.99%	-0.24%

Volatility

TINY vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.69%	4.69%	+7.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.55%	11.98%	+14.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.75%	16.04%	+16.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.38%	22.27%	+10.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.38%	22.27%	+10.11%

TINY vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.19%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and KROP in my portfolio?

TINY and KROP have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or KROP?

TINY has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or KROP?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 30.24% vs 0.72% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 30.24% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.19% for TINY.

What is the main difference between TINY and KROP?

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.