TINT vs. IGE
TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and IGE (iShares North American Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TINT tracks the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net while IGE tracks the S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 10.12%/yr vs 20.25%/yr for IGE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGE.
Performance
TINT vs. IGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly higher than IGE's 22.98% return.
TINT
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 25.24%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 44.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 22.98%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 43.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
TINT vs. IGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 25.24% | 16.13% | -13.37% | 20.04% | -28.14% | 1.71% |
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 22.98% | 20.41% | 7.55% | 3.12% | 33.24% | -0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINT and IGE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.49 |
The correlation between TINT and IGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TINT vs. IGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TINT
IGE
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
TINT
IGE
Technology
TINT
IGE
-
Industrials
TINT
IGE
Financial Services
TINT
IGE
-
Healthcare
TINT
IGE
Communication Services
TINT
-
IGE
-
Consumer Cyclical
TINT
-
IGE
Consumer Defensive
TINT
-
IGE
-
Energy
TINT
-
IGE
Real Estate
TINT
-
IGE
-
Utilities
TINT
-
IGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINT vs. IGE — Risk / Return Rank
TINT
IGE
TINT vs. IGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINT | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.75 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 3.64 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 7.93 | -5.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 19.51 | -10.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINT | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.75 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.30 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TINT vs. IGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum IGE drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and IGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINT | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.36% | -67.55% | +26.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | -5.54% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | -19.49% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -2.86% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -18.90% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 2.25% | +2.58% |
Volatility
TINT vs. IGE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) at 4.40%. This indicates that TINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINT | IGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 4.40% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 12.67% | +7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.75% | 15.98% | +7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 22.45% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 24.94% | -1.48% |
TINT vs. IGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IGE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINT vs. IGE - Dividend Comparison
TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than IGE's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.89% | 2.32% | 2.54% | 2.85% | 2.96% | 2.92% | 3.34% | 5.55% | 2.68% | 2.11% | 1.66% | 3.08% |
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINT and IGE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to IGE (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs IGE's -67.55%.
On 3-year performance, IGE leads with 20.25% vs 10.12% for TINT. On fees, IGE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGE has performed better with a 20.25% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINT.
IGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.98% for TINT.
TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IGE tracks S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.39% for IGE.
IGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINT and IGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer