PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TINT vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TINT vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TINT tracks the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 10.12%/yr vs 22.78%/yr for CRAK. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

TINT vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 33.23% return.

TINT

1D
-2.01%
1M
9.06%
YTD
25.24%
6M
25.40%
1Y
44.33%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CRAK

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
33.23%
6M
27.96%
1Y
67.58%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
13.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF		25.24%16.13%-13.37%20.04%-28.14%1.71%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		33.23%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and CRAK is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between TINT and CRAK has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINT vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TINT
CRAK

Basic Materials

22.9%
1.1%

Technology

10.9%

-

Industrials

4.3%
4.0%

Financial Services

3.6%

-

Healthcare

2.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

98.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

TINT
22.9%
CRAK
1.1%

Technology

TINT
10.9%
CRAK

-

Industrials

TINT
4.3%
CRAK
4.0%

Financial Services

TINT
3.6%
CRAK

-

Healthcare

TINT
2.2%
CRAK

-

Communication Services

TINT

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

TINT

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Defensive

TINT

-

CRAK

-

Energy

TINT

-

CRAK
98.9%

Real Estate

TINT

-

CRAK

-

Utilities

TINT

-

CRAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Smart Materials ETF

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

Often compared with TINT:
TINT vs. CTEXTINT vs. FMATTINT vs. XLEITINT vs. TNGYTINT vs. QLDTINT vs. INFRTINT vs. ION
Often compared with CRAK:
CRAK vs. XLECRAK vs. OIHCRAK vs. VDECRAK vs. IEOCRAK vs. USAICRAK vs. AMLPCRAK vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

TINT vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TINT
TINT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TINTCRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.88
3.70

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.57
4.76

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.62

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

7.93

-5.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

22.48

-13.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINT vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TINTCRAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.70

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.60

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.54

-0.44

Drawdowns

TINT vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and CRAK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TINTCRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.36%

-58.80%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-8.57%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.42%

-35.61%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-35.61%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.80%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-3.81%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-12.50%

-8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

3.02%

+1.81%

Volatility

TINT vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.74%. This indicates that TINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TINTCRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

6.74%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

14.27%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.75%

18.35%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

20.61%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

22.16%

+1.30%

TINT vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than CRAK's 1.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		1.51%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF		0.98%1.27%1.47%0.99%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TINT and CRAK have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to CRAK (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

On 3-year performance, CRAK leads with 22.78% vs 10.12% for TINT. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 22.78% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.98% for TINT.

TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINT and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer