TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) and CMGG.TO (CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TINF.TO returned 12.77%/yr vs 20.56%/yr for CMGG.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINF.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CMGG.TO.

Performance

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than CMGG.TO's 21.24% return.

TINF.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 8.63%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: —

CMGG.TO

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 10.96%
• YTD: 21.24%
• 6M: 21.36%
• 1Y: 38.88%
• 3Y*: 35.34%
• 5Y*: 20.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF	9.87%	14.91%	22.73%	4.63%	3.82%	6.92%
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund	21.24%	21.00%	52.95%	24.21%	-21.16%	11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TINF.TO and CMGG.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021	0.27

Return for Risk

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINF.TO

TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 45
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CMGG.TO

CMGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CMGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CMGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CMGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CMGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINF.TO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.36	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.14	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	3.85	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.60	10.77	-3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINF.TO and CMGG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINF.TO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	2.36	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	1.14	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.98	0.00

Drawdowns

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.48%, smaller than the maximum CMGG.TO drawdown of -29.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and CMGG.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINF.TO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.48%	-29.00%	+15.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.03%	-10.15%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.23%	-22.85%	+12.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.48%	-29.00%	+15.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	0.00%	-3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-8.91%	+6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	3.62%	-1.66%

Volatility

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) is 4.87%, while CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that TINF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINF.TO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	6.68%	-1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	12.94%	-4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.39%	16.53%	-6.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.83%	18.22%	-6.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.02%	18.49%	-6.47%

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINF.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than CMGG.TO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINF.TO vs. CMGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while CMGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF	2.65%	2.89%	2.85%	3.39%	2.97%	2.28%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINF.TO and CMGG.TO in my portfolio?

TINF.TO and CMGG.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TINF.TO or CMGG.TO?

On fees, TINF.TO is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINF.TO or CMGG.TO?

TINF.TO is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CMGG.TO.

What is the main difference between TINF.TO and CMGG.TO?

They also come from different issuers: TD and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for TINF.TO and 0.90% for CMGG.TO.